New tools for personal learning

New tools for personal learning

by Deleted user -
Number of replies: 6
New tools for personal learning

A presentation by Stephen Downes which brings together a number of different themes of an ongoing discussion about approaches to and tools for personal learning. Play the audio and click along through his embedded slides (closely tied to the audio so you'll know when to click - and don't be daunted by 62 slides, they're not verbose). He begins by discussing an imperative of learning: in the absence of simple causes and effects, to make sense of masses of seemingly chaotic information and create new circumstances. He then proceeds to talk about the aims of learning and differentiate these from the apprehension of content. After introducing some of his adventures with technology, he ends:

"The idea here ... is to create networks of interactions, to aggregate, remix, repurpose, feed forward content from our very desktop, from our very own computers, to each other around the internet, to create a personal learning centre, rather than something that is owned by Google or something that is owned by a university or a college. The idea here is we have a diverse network with multiple views, multiple perspectives, multiple technologies, and these different technologies are connected and interactive, they are not integrated into a single whole. They are, as David Weinberger said, small pieces loosely joined. The idea is that this network is open - it's not a closed system - it is an open network of sharing from one information provider to another information provider."
In reply to Deleted user

Re: New tools for personal learning

by Deleted user -
If we go along with this thesis - that of openness, and sharing of information to enable everyone to create their own body of knowledge from which to learn - why is it that 99% of the courses on learn.gold from departments require a codeword to access them? What possible justifiable rationale can this have? Should we not be encouraging students (and teachers) to browse in areas slightly different from the ones they are "officially" studying and to find out about developments in other specialities? Why is knowledge being treated as though it is some kind of military secret?
In reply to Deleted user

Re: New tools for personal learning

by Deleted user -
I completely agree. It would be great to have access to other VLE course pages.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: New tools for personal learning

by Deleted user -
I agree - it's great if students and academics are able to look at, and cross reference between, different course areas. However, there are good reasons tutors may wish to password protect an area. My feeling is that, within the law and local regulations, this should be at the discretion of individual tutors and accordingly we do leave it entirely to them.

There are three levels of access: completely public; available to anybody with a Goldsmiths login; password-protected. If you have an interest in an area but can't get into it, I'd recommend emailing a brief introduction and request for access to one of its tutors (you can see them listed in the results when you search for an area). I can't guarantee they'll agree, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.
In reply to Deleted user

Re: New tools for personal learning

by Angela Phillips -
Just to be different - I don't agree at all. I think human beings crave the security of closed gardens just as much as they want to be free to wander. I use open and closed areas. I think that for some things people want just to talk to each other in a small safe group. For other matters (such as providing readings and course outlines) there is no need for that intimacy. The idea that 'information wants to be free' has become a new orthodoxy which is just as rigid and constraining as any other dogma.
In reply to Angela Phillips

Re: New tools for personal learning

by Deleted user -
"I think human beings crave the security of closed gardens just as much as they want to be free to wander".

On learn.gold, course area editors get to decide about their area. Like Angela, learn.gold recognises a distinction between the content of a course area (the stuff people listen to, read, watch or look at) and the interactions between the people, or between people and the stuff (on learn.gold these are called Resources and Activities respectively).

Any of the Activities can be set up for Groups, and those Groups can be private. Setting up Groups and then applying them to, say Discussion Forums, allows spaces for secure, private interactions within more open areas. It is possible to restrict access to Resources too, by embedding them within Grouped activities. Learn.gold is pretty flexible, and becoming more so (although the settings are not always obvious). It's also porous, allowing editors to draw in, say, news feeds or DIY search engines, and other embedded tools or resources from the wider web, as I have tried to illustrate on learn.gold's front page.

And if you scroll down the front page, right-hand-side, you come to a link to Mahara, learn.gold's educational networking counterpart conceived with individuals at the centre rather than course areas. Mahara allows us - students and staff alike and without having to request a space - to upload materials or set up blogs, which we can then make available, or not, in a number of Views we can configure as we wish, which we can share with whomever we choose.